
Executive Communication · September 20, 2026
A Better Structure for High-Stakes Executive Messages
A structure for executive messages that leads with the audience problem, evidence, limits and a credible next action.
The Blog
Essays from the intersection of research and practice — what audiences are telling us about the words organizations use, and how to use better ones.

Executive Communication · September 20, 2026
A structure for executive messages that leads with the audience problem, evidence, limits and a credible next action.

Why bolder language can lose trust when evidence, scope and limits disappear.
Read the essay
The qualifiers leaders cut for confidence are often the words that make a claim believable.
Read the essay
Experts hear probability and precision; audiences hear relevance, consequences, control and motive.
Read the essay
Clarity helps people understand the claim; credibility helps them decide whether to trust it.
Read the essay
Accuracy is necessary, but skeptical audiences also test completeness, motive, plainness and plausibility.
Read the essay
When the book was written, skepticism was a rising tide. Today it's the water everyone swims in. Revisiting the four principles of credible communication in an era of AI-generated content, collapsed institutional trust, and audiences who fact-check in real time.
Read the essay
Years ago I wrote about "the year of the apology." It turned out to be the decade, and then the era. Why most corporate apologies fail before the second sentence — and the anatomy of the rare ones that actually restore trust.
Read the essay
Every claim you add to a message taxes the credibility of the ones already there. The discipline of subtraction: how cutting your message in half makes the remaining half twice as believable.
Read the essayMichael's keynotes bring the research behind these essays to conferences, leadership teams, and sales organizations.
Book Michael to Speak